A QUESTION OF "ins" ??

So holding public office doesn't give the public a "right" to know about the personal quirkiness of the servant office holders?

Here we are, flooded with media details regarding Senator Ensign, Governor Schwarzenegger, and somewhat tangentially, the has-been Newt Gingrich et al.

I was somewhat amazed a few mornings ago at several call-in viewers on the Republican line reserved for them by WashingtonJournal/C-Span, declaring "it" is none of our business.

I beg to differ. I see a clear relationship between INtegrity and INfidelity........how can one expect a public office holder to be faithful to his oath of office if he cannot even abide by a sacred oath to the legal spouse? No vote of mine will knowingly go to electing candidates with impaired character- and Gingrich's lack of perception of how his infidelity antics have impacted any possibility of him becoming a viable presidential candidate is an example of how removed such politicians are from the general public and of the values so necessary for trust.

Begone already.

graysmoke