??OBSOLESCENCE??

What to do now? Military intervention in another country possibly has been castrated by the social network instant revolution phenom. Moving equipment and personnel does not travel at byte speed nor do the decisions.

Are nations now going to be dependent on diplomacy and who might lead on that score?

IMO it is a positive move to let the individuals in any nation have the most input in deciding their governmental style. Putting a "Made in the USA" stamp on it takes away the important sense of accomplishment of these new social/political behaviors.

Peace cometh --- - now when and how?

graysmoke

T-POTTY-ers

They have cornered the market on a perpetual renewable resource, their chambers continually refill with top quality BS!!

They keep on target with the main goal to prevent a second term for one of the most competent presidents this country has ever had. The daily production of such massive piles of BS seems to confirm that they have that to fear and they are really big on fear.

The threat to the U.S. is greater from the T-POTTY-ers than from any other source. Why are they dangerous? Because they are so full of Faux channel misinformation and propaganda. And what passes as comprehension of the Constitution deserves an F grade. The misinterpretation of the second amendment is testimony to that.

They are a danger also because their impact is more visible because noise matters more it seems than quiet thoughtful reflection on just what good government should be and how it can be gained.

Meanwhile the Presidents efforts to rescue the country from the disaster left by the Bush/Cheney regime are highly unappreciated.


graysmoke